Language selection


Quantification of Plant-level HCLPF Capacity in Probabilistic Safety Assessment-Based Seismic Margin Assessment

Abstract of the technical paper/presentation presented at:
International Topical Meeting on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Analysis
September 24–28, 2017

Prepared by:
Zhaoliang Wang, Smain Yalaoui, and Yolande Akl
Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission


Probabilistic safety assessment (PSA)-based seismic margin assessment (SMA), compared to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission SMA and to the Electric Power Research Institute SMA, retains the most similarity to the seismic PSA, where a full-scope systems-analysis is performed to identify the dominant accident sequences leading to severe core damage (SCD). Plant-level seismic fragility, representing the plant seismic capacity and the associated uncertainties, is a function of fragilities of individual structures, systems, and components (SSC), random failure rates, and human error probabilities. The plant-level seismic fragility, based on which the plant-level high-confidence-of-low-probability-of-failure (HCLPF) capacity can be rigorously derived, integrates information from all important accident sequences for SCD.

Two quantification methods have been used for deriving the plant-level HCLPF capacity in the PSA-based SMA: the “min-max” method and the convolution method, respectively. The min-max method is a simplistic method for deriving an approximate plant-level HCLPF capacity from the most important sequence and component-level HCLPF capacities. It provides only a rough approximation and may result in a distorted HCLPF capacity that is higher or lower than the true value. Therefore, the use of the min-max method should be justified and follow certain guidance. The convolution method determines the plant-level capacity by convolving/combining individual SSC fragilities and random failure rates according to the Boolean expression for SCD. It provides an integrative production of the plant-level capacity based on all important accident sequences.

This paper compares the min-max method and the convolution method, in terms of the required input, assumptions, computational complexity, and output plant-level HCLPF capacity. Using simple plant logic models and SSC fragilities, the performance of the following three computational cases are evaluated: (1) convolution method to derive plant-level capacity and Monte Carlo simulation to explicitly consider the two types of uncertainties in SSC capacities; (2) the convolution method and the use of composite uncertainty in SSC capacity; and (3) the simplistic min-max method. The relative accuracy and computational efforts of the three computational cases are evaluated. In addition, current Canadian practice in the quantification of plant-level HCLPF capacity is briefly summarized.

To obtain a copy of the abstract’s document, please contact us at or call 613.995.5894 or 1.800.668.5284 (in Canada). When contacting us, please provide the title and date of the abstract.

Page details

Date modified: